Miller Law attorneys have repeatedly obtained history-making results:

• In In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust Litig., 10 MDL 2196 (N.D. Ohio), Miller Law attorneys obtained a $151 million settlement on behalf of a certified class of indirect purchasers of flexible polyurethane foam. The amount is believed to represent the fourth largest antitrust recovery ever on behalf of an indirect purchaser class.

   

• In In re Sumitomo Copper Litig., 96-4584 (MP) (S.D.N.Y.), Miller Law attorneys helped obtain a $136 million class-wide settlement stemming from the alleged manipulation of the world copper market. At the time, the settlement represented the largest settlement in the 75 plus year history of the Commodity Exchange Act.

   

• In In re Baldwin-United Corp. Sec. Litig., MDL-581 (S.D.N.Y.), Miller Law attorneys helped obtain a $180 million settlement in one of the the largest securities class action settlements of the time.

To date, Miller Law attorneys, almost exclusively on a contingency fee basis, have helped recover more than $1.5 billion on behalf of our clients and the classes we’ve represented. This achievement was made possible through the dedication and hard work of our attorneys, who have demonstrated unwavering commitment to securing justice for our clients. We approach every case with a combination of grit, determination, and smart legal strategies, and we are passionate about delivering results that make a difference. Our firm’s success is a testament to our attorneys’ skills and expertise in complex litigation matters.

The attorneys at Miller Law are committed to achieving results and holding wrongdoers accountable for their actions.  We leave no stone unturned in or efforts to secure the most favorable outcomes for our clients. 

• In In re Liquid Aluminum Sulfate Antitrust Litig., 16-MD-02687 (D. N. J.). Miller Law attorneys obtained a $33 million recovery as co-lead counsel on behalf of a class of indirect purchasers in antitrust litigation arising out of a nationwide price-fixing, bid-rigging and market allocation scheme among the country’s dominant manufacturers of liquid aluminum sulfate. The $33 million recovery represented an amount in excess of 100% of the treble damages being sought in the case — a result which is believed to be unprecedented in antitrust class action litigation.
  
  

• In Smith v. FirstEnergy Corp., et al., Case No. 2:20-cv-3755 (S.D. Ohio), Miller Law attorneys represented consumers of electricity who had allegedly been unlawfully overcharged for electricity. The defendants argued that the class had no claim because they had been paid back by the defendants after their alleged unlawful conduct had been revealed.  Miller Law attorneys successfully defeated that argument and achieved a $49,000,000 class-wide cash settlement, despite the class having been allegedly paid back.